CNPG: ENVIRONMENT AND MOVEMENT GROUP
Meeting 17.2.14
Daphne
Lees Chris
Whitton
Jack
Wood Chris
Donovan (Lead)
Frank
Chivers
The aim of the meeting was to discuss the issues within
environment and movement and to identify some of the issues that are likely to
form the basis of questions to the public and eventually translate into policy
options within the Cottesmore Neighbourhood Plan (CNP).
General discussion about the nature of the Cottesmore
population and the information about age profile for example. Population is ageing, but at same time
growing number of young people, both of which have implications for facilities
and pattern of activity.
Traffic
Subjects identified:
·
Speeding of traffic, particularly along the B668
·
Role within strategic road network
·
Traffic requirements from development
·
Road traffic accident history
·
Road safety and signage
It was acknowledged that the main road through the village
unlikely to have a changed designation, but it is signed from Oakham as the route
for all traffic (including HGV’s) to the A1 northwards. Last regular Leicestershire Police Survey was
in 2011. Need to assess information from
this. Also need information on the
origin/destination of HGV traffic through the village to understand which is
through traffic to the A1 and which has a more local destination.
Issues for Consultation
1.
Does traffic need to be slowed down through the
village and what type of measures would you favour? This could include speed tables, interactive
speed warning signs, rumble strips, other physical interventions, pedestrian
crossings.
2.
Are the 30 mph signs in the correct position,
i.e. should they be further back, particularly on Burley Road (east bound) and
Market Overton Road (southbound).
3.
Should attempts be made to deliver pressure to
alter the signing priorities for the A!, so that traffic is directed primarily
along the A606.
Parking
Subjects identified:
·
Importance of maintaining car parking in centre
of village
·
Other parking areas
·
Role of car park in Mill Street; role of Village
Hall car park
·
Parking area outside The Sun
Generally agreed that the availability of car parking is
important to underpin the economic role of village facilities. However, also acknowledged that there can be
significant road safety issues associated with parking, for example, around the
schools and the pinch point in the centre of the village. Also at busy times of the week.
Issues for Consultation
4. Is there
sufficient parking in the heart of the village around the Post Office Shop/
Fish ‘n Chip shop? If more required where would it go?
5. Should there
be improvements to parking in the centre of the front of The Sun? If so what
should happen?
6. Are there
other car parking areas that could play an improved role in supporting the village, for example, by improving
linkage or better signing. Locations
would include the car park at
the Village Community Hall, the car park on Mill Street etc.
Road lay-out
considerations
The group also discussed the existing road lay-out
throughout the Parish. Whilst accepting
that there is limited scope for fundamental change and accepting, for example,
the designation of the main B668, there are locations in and around Cottesmore
that have been identified as in need of improvement if only from a road safety
user perspective.
Areas identified:
·
“The Spinney” – where road from Market Overton
meets B668
·
Where Exton Road joins the B668
Issues for Consultation
7. Should there
be changed alignment to make the area safer and clearer where Market Overton Road, Ashwell Road and Main
Road all come together? In particular,
to improve sight lines and
simplify the junction options. What ways
could these be improved?
8. Traffic
turning right into Exton Road from the Toll Bar (B668) is crossing with limited
visibility until quite
late. Would traffic calming at this
point be of help and, if so, what?
[Also note
issue relating to pedestrian crossing – see next section].
9. Are there other locations in the Parish
where there are significant road lay-out issues?.
Footpaths/Pedestrian
Movement
Subjects included:
·
Locations in the centre of the village where
footway ceases to exist.
·
Parking on footways throughout the village –
limiting access for emergency vehicles.
·
Condition of footpaths
·
Linkage of footpaths to surrounding area and
wider footpath network
·
Pedestrian crossing points
Consideration given to how footpaths working in the
area. Generally a number of issues relating
to their condition and misuse. Also felt
that movement within the village reasonable, but beyond the village footpaths
either don’t exist of are in very poor condition. Also felt that as a result the village isn’t
plugged comfortably into the wider Rutland footpath network, forcing people to
use a car first when rambling, dog walking, etc.
Issues for Consultation
10. Should more
work be done on clearing footpaths and should there be more metalled areas (as, for example, on north side
of Burley Road)?
11. Should
footpaths be linked better to wider Rutland footpath network?
12. Are there
places in Cottesmore where footpath links should be improved and/or provided. Also consideration needs to be given to improved
lighting/facilities (e.g. Clatterpot
Lane)?
Cycling/Horse
Riding
Some discussion on importance of other forms of
transport. Considered whether there is
sometimes conflict with other users, particularly pedestrians.
Issues for Consultation
13. Should there
be separate facilities for cycles on the highway and, if so, where in the village?
14. Should
bridleways be provided and, if so, where are these particular issues?
Public Transport
It was considered important to collect accurately bus
movement information in and around Cottesmore. Generally it is felt that buses that
exist are good and follow the time-table.
However, there are so few that it makes organising activity around them
difficult. It is also likely that there
are not going to be sufficient resources for significant increases in bus
services, so maybe some element of choice will be needed as to where any
emphasis for change should be placed.
Currently the only bus directly serving
Cottesmore is the Rutland Flyer 2 which provides
a service every two hours, in one
direction to Oakham and in the other to Melton
Mowbray.
Issues for Consultation
15. Is the
frequency of this service sufficient to meet the parish’s needs and are
there other
routes which could be campaigned for?
Ignore this page see environmental page
ReplyDelete